I THINK ∴ I'M DANGEROUS

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
bfe [2016/04/05 19:51]
zashi [Framework]
bfe [2016/05/26 14:52]
zashi [BFE]
Line 5: Line 5:
  
  
-<​html>​ 
-<a href="​https://​scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/​hphotos-xpa1/​v/​t1.0-9/​11216567_10203633998770577_6143067410198800947_n.jpg?​oh=96f6ae5cee070c0d138ef6a372e97d85&​oe=56A0FE0F"><​img src="​https://​scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/​hphotos-xpa1/​v/​t1.0-9/​11216567_10203633998770577_6143067410198800947_n.jpg?​oh=96f6ae5cee070c0d138ef6a372e97d85&​oe=56A0FE0F"​ width="​100%">​ 
-</a> 
-</​html>​ 
  
 ====== Abstract ====== ====== Abstract ======
Line 30: Line 26:
 BFE is the framework in it's entirety. Previous versions of BFE relied on a master script with a slave running for each core in a cluster. BFE is the framework in it's entirety. Previous versions of BFE relied on a master script with a slave running for each core in a cluster.
  
-The latest incarnation consists a single Tcl script using an interpreter with OpenMPI bindings. A stand-alone executable is used for running the bf code and a C-based Tcl extension provides the '​nmc'​ command used to evaluate ​output.+The latest incarnation consists a single Tcl script using an interpreter with OpenMPI bindings. A stand-alone executable is used for running the bf code and a C-based Tcl extension provides the '​nmc'​ command used to score output.
  
 BFE tracks all mutations it generates, but when considering the next generation, it groups by score and picks randomly from the top 2% of this population. In this way, different '​species'​ are picked rather than the same species of strand overfilling the top ranks. BFE tracks all mutations it generates, but when considering the next generation, it groups by score and picks randomly from the top 2% of this population. In this way, different '​species'​ are picked rather than the same species of strand overfilling the top ranks.
Line 50: Line 46:
 ===== n-Depth Mean Compare ===== ===== n-Depth Mean Compare =====
  
-Perhaps the greatest challenge in putting BFE together was determining how to score strands. [[:​n-Depth_Mean_Compare|n-Depth Mean Compare]] (NMC) compares one ordered set of bytes to another of potentially differing length. NMC returns a floating point greater than 0. The closer to zero, the more similar the sets are. A score of zero means the sets are identical.+Perhaps the greatest challenge in putting BFE together was determining how to score strands. [[:​n-Depth_Mean_Compare|n-Depth Mean Compare]] (NMC) compares one ordered set of bytes to another of potentially differing length. NMC returns a floating point greater than or equal to 0. The closer to zero, the more similar the sets are. A score of zero means the sets are identical.
  
 In function and practice, NMC is similar to calculating [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Jaccard_index|Jaccard distance]], but also takes into account how far removed the set of bytes are from one another, not just how many bytes are common between the two. To clarify, NMC does not just calculate how similar one set is to another. The lower the n-Depth Mean Compare score, the fewer steps are needed to transform one set to the other. In function and practice, NMC is similar to calculating [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Jaccard_index|Jaccard distance]], but also takes into account how far removed the set of bytes are from one another, not just how many bytes are common between the two. To clarify, NMC does not just calculate how similar one set is to another. The lower the n-Depth Mean Compare score, the fewer steps are needed to transform one set to the other.