Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
bfe [2016/04/05 19:55] zashi [n-Depth Mean Compare] |
bfe [2016/11/08 17:21] zashi [Brainfuck] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
- | <html> | ||
- | <a href="https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/11216567_10203633998770577_6143067410198800947_n.jpg?oh=96f6ae5cee070c0d138ef6a372e97d85&oe=56A0FE0F"><img src="https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/11216567_10203633998770577_6143067410198800947_n.jpg?oh=96f6ae5cee070c0d138ef6a372e97d85&oe=56A0FE0F" width="100%"> | ||
- | </a> | ||
- | </html> | ||
====== Abstract ====== | ====== Abstract ====== | ||
Line 22: | Line 18: | ||
Programmatically, the read/write head is equivalent to a pointer and the sheet is simply a contiguous block of RAM. | Programmatically, the read/write head is equivalent to a pointer and the sheet is simply a contiguous block of RAM. | ||
- | In many ways, BF is ideal to use as programmatic genes. Aside from being Turing-complete, which allows it to do anything that can be accomplished with any other programming language, strings of non-functional code can exist and be bypassed. With a single character (command) mutation that bypassed code path can become active, just like actual genetic code consisting of base-pairs. | + | In many ways, BF is ideal to use as programmatic genes. Aside from being Turing-complete, which allows it to do anything that can be accomplished with any other programming language, strings of non-functional code can exist and be bypassed. With a single character (command) mutation that bypassed code path can become active, just like actual genetic code consisting of codons. |
====== Specific Design Needs ====== | ====== Specific Design Needs ====== |